Ethics Essay Essay

The theories of virtue, utilitarianism, and deontology atomic number 18 comparable in some aspects provided for the most divulge are very different. Each of the theories will be explained to show their differences and the type of soul that would gravitate towards that supposition. through the explanations one would also be able to dish out where there morals or ethics whitethorn lie but can also entrance themselves in each supposition. The fairness Theory, also hit the hay as Virtue Ethics, refers to the char routineer of each someone. This system states that every person should try for excellence.The characteristics of each item-by-item are made up from their environment that they are a scatter of. The theory would further raise that it is not defined as a undivided moment in each individuals life but their entire life as a whole. In thinking to the highest degree the Virtue Theory, it can be explained by stating that each person needs to be the best they can and turn a counseling the need or ability to hurt otherwises. In Basic ethics Basic ethics in action it talks about Aristotle and his view on virtue ethics to include characteristics or virtues of an individual. in that respect are some that Aristotle would suggest to be the median(a) or virtues such as courage, self- apply, proper emotion, and love to name a few. Reviewing these ideals of what characteristics a person should posses would or could be considered common traits of most individuals in the land today. In the simplistic form the virtue theory is about better one self and the other individuals that are around them. Deontology Theory states that there is a moral duty for one to act no matter the circumstances.This theory is furthered by the thought figure out of not thinking through any actions or the consequences but because it is action that is taken is right. The word deontology comes from two Greek words, deion+ logos. Deion comes from the authorityicle dei which meat must. Logos (in this context) means the account of (Boylan, 2009). In breaking this down, it shows that is the account of the musts. In consequence one must act on the account of others or for themselves. Deontology theory can be imposen within those persons that provide protection for another without unbelief no matter the inherent danger.The will to act is shown through this theory such as that would be considered of the Spartan Army. The Spartan Army would not read how many strong are the enemy but where the enemy is. Utilitarianism Theory is one that embodies the thought of fetching care of the whole group and not the individual. This theory is a moral theory as we see involveing to make the group better. It can whole be our morals to drive us to want what is best for a group. If one person is stronger in writing than another during the course of the project, then the weaker generator may ask the stronger one to take over.It is conditioned your personal weakness a nd asking or forego your own glory to better the group that you are part of. One that can set deviation their pride is a far better person and shows their true sense of morals. In thinking about a personal experience to be discussed in combination with one of these theories, I keep glide path back to the theory of utilitarianism. The reason being that I know I nonplus an alpha personality, meaning that I like to be in control and have the control. I tend to leave this part of me outside the mannikinroom to have a pass away head and to allow the learning teams to work more than cohesive with the other members.It has been my experience that issues have arisen in each of the groups that I have been a part of. This is either due to lack of participation, inability to give out or the plain fact of laziness. I have stopped from gifting the team member numerous measure in order to keep the team move in the right direction. Later in the class the issues continue to build and that is when I will confront the person and attempt to deal with the issue. I heart that in setting aside my alpha mental capacity and waiting to confront the individual is a way for the betterment of the learning team as whole.